Monday, September 19, 2011

Tommy Seahawk Identity Revealed

Have yall been wondering who the new writer is (despite the tone and style of the writing staying the same)???

Some of yall have probably guessed correctly that the writer never changed.  I was just tryna remove my name/presence from this in order to not let it prevent me from getting a job in the future.  Sorry if I annoyed anyone, it was just a method of protecting myself.  Please help me out by continuing this anonymous trend via comments, I would appreciate it.  Thanks.  Again, sorry if it was off-putting.  And if anyone is interested in contributing, feel free to contact me.  Thanks again yall.

22 comments:

  1. benjes, you god damn ass lieutenant, we all knew it was you, you blithering fool

    ReplyDelete
  2. major disappointed in your readership not being able to easily identify the distinct brand of irreverent wit and charm that could only belong to Ben Ganges

    ReplyDelete
  3. Woah bro! I said that some such as yourself, oh glorious @9:30 anon, figured it out, but plenty of people did not

    ReplyDelete
  4. very lame. you should get jack mumby to blog and bring that insane militant leftist spin... at least it would be funny

    ReplyDelete
  5. um, i don't think the tone and style did say the same. i think this is a giant conspiracy to bring back our figurehead while relying on nonwitty underwriters. do not accept the liesssss! they have taken the author. pannicccc!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Only you could still think "via" is hilarious.

    ReplyDelete
  7. (P.S. It's not. It's dead. Move on. Take "panic" with you.)

    ReplyDelete
  8. What if all these anonymous commentors are just the author...

    CONSPIRACY PANIC

    ReplyDelete
  9. If you don't think via is funny you're not smart enough to "get" it

    ReplyDelete
  10. If I decided to replace words randomly with the phrase "hot dog," would that be funny? Yeah, maybe the first five times. That is the equivalent of Ken's disgusting misuse of "via." Saddest part is that he probably started it on accident, not understanding how to use it.

    ReplyDelete
  11. What, are you serious, I know how to use via, I just choose not to via it still makes me laugh.

    ReplyDelete
  12. They see me trollin', they laughin'

    -David

    ReplyDelete
  13. You ever see those sad comics doing the same routines 10 years later?

    ReplyDelete
  14. http://images.cheezburger.com/completestore/2011/2/1/88c44e81-e1cd-460f-8889-86c87468e3db.jpg

    ReplyDelete
  15. He wasn't trying to troll...

    ReplyDelete
  16. OK, that came out harsh, so I apologize. Yes, I'm over "via," but the truth is I read your blog a lot because you're funny and you do post stuff that no one else is posting, some of which is really important (and some of which is just juicy gossip). Keep on keepin' on (but don't let it go to your head).

    ReplyDelete
  17. Aww thank you! Sad to see that you are over "via" via you don't like worn out gimmicks.

    ReplyDelete
  18. At least you admit it's worn out. :)

    ReplyDelete
  19. one day this dumbass will accidentally use via correctly and then the joke will be over

    ReplyDelete
  20. You're an ass via rude words.

    ReplyDelete