Here is a
It is particularly distressing to me to face external limitations on employee eligibility for salary increases. We will continue to work with legislators in Annapolis to broaden eligibility, and ultimately, to see an end to the state wage freeze.
This year, despite the state wage freeze, we have been able to work within state guidelines to make a number of salary increases effective in January 2012.
Scheduled January 2012 Increases:
Faculty – 58
23 Assistant Professors
22 Associate Professors
13 Professors
Also, in January 2011, 40 tenure-track, assistant professors received increases.
Faculty adjustments listed here do not include salary increases that come as a result of promotions, tenure, and periodic reviews. Over 50 faculty members received this category of salary increase in 2011. Others are eligible for these increases in 2012.
Faculty Librarians – 2
Staff – 18
4 Athletics
4 President’s Cabinet
2 Business Office
2 Campus Technology Support Services
1 Academic Services
1 Advancement
1 Facilities
1 Financial Aid
1 Registrar’s Office
1 Waterfront
The student newspaper has a story this week with partial information about salaries on campus that I and others have found to be misleading, and unfortunate. I intend this email to help us all understand the issues we face regarding salary increases, and the progress we’ve made within state limitations. I am happy to meet with anyone, singly or in groups, to discuss the situation and the decisions we’ve implemented.
Joseph Urgo
President
St. Mary's College of Maryland
Only comment here that I want to make is that while positions such as athletics, president's cabinet, CTSS, and the various offices, none of these (other than the one facilities pay increase, which I could guess may have gone to Kevin Mercer [bless his soul, beautiful man]) are going towards the staff that the students are concerned about, those working for low(ish) hourly wages.
So, there are some facts about this, primarily for the alumni readers. Check out the article's comments, especially the 4chan troll, along with some insightful commentary.
Oh and there was a reply to the Urgo all student email from above:
I agree with President Urgo’s statement that The Point News article is not totally accurate, but I disagree that it is “misleading” and “unfortunate.” The salient message of the article is that the most poorly paid employees at SMCM are not getting raises. In this message, the article is accurate, and tells a story that needs to be told.
Matthew (25:29) said it millennia ago:
For to everyone who has, more shall be given, and he will have an abundance; but from the one who does not have, even what he does have shall be taken away.
So, how do we solve this problem within the constraints of the State’s mandate? We have efforts under way to establish a Joe Carroll Staff Award, with a 1 of 1 match for an unnamed donor. If you haven’t already contributed to that fund and can afford it, do so. Your $1 is worth $2.
But a once-a-year fund will not solve an endemic problem.
The Point News article mentioned support for establishing “a fund to reserve money until it would be legal to disperse among the staff.” I, and I am sure many others, call on the President and other “operationally critical staff” to explore this and other creative solutions. Let’s all be part of the solution, not the problem.
Not sure that we needed the religious quote, but it does bring up the issue of 'rich get richer, poor get poorer' along with other good points. Hope this educated yall to some degree, please leave comments if I missed anything or am wrong about anything or if I am still unfunny etc. thank you
SEACREST OUT
