so a lot of folks are upset about this terrible
shitty article in the Baltimore Sun the other day which is understandable
since the piece reads like it was researched by skimming halfway thru the list
of SMCM’s first year seminars but ending up on youtube watching a montage of eric
cartman whining about hippies instead. Some have focused their criticisms on
Anne Neal herself, using the sort of language people always seem to feel more
comfortable directing at women. realistically though, when a nonprofit
president like Neal places an op-ed, the writing is the product of a team
effort more often than not -- so it's worth taking a look at the team.
the American Council of Trustees and Alumni was founded by Lynne
Cheney -- after 9-11 she used it to attack academics who opposed
her husband's war(s). now, they’ve rebranded themselves as advocates for “academic freedom”
crusading against "political correctness" -- most notably with their vocal support
for ousted harvard president Larry Summers when he caught flak for arguing that
women
are underrepresented in science and engineering because they aren't as smart as
men.
like most think tanks babbling about “market-oriented
solutions,” ACTA doesn’t publicly disclose their donors, but they do have ties
to charles koch, the kevin bacon of right-wing pigfuckers. oh and did i
mention that edwin meese,
best known for vocally opposing miranda warnings, having the national guard
beat down beat down student protesters, and militarizing the war on drugs as
Reagan's attorney general sits on their board too? shit!
ACTA put out a report
whining that too few students are required to take a course on shakespeare,
lamenting that students are instead encouraged to study "popular
culture" -- apparently, critically analyzing work produced for mass appeal only has academic value if it was written before people
figured out they should shit and eat in different rooms. really, the entire op-ed
drips with that same parochial mentality that education's value can only be
measured in terms of quantifiable knowledge about particular dead white men --
she literally invokes our WGSX program for laughs.
and this clayton christensen guy she quotes, his studies in
"disruptive innovation" look at technological advancements that displace
older markets (iTunes replacing CDs, etc.) one
of his favorite examples is how for-profit online degree mills like the
University of Phoenix (with help from "reformers" like ACTA) will eventually
supplant traditional higher education. To these folks, education is
just another industry to make money off of, and educators are only here to
tell us factoids about the war of 1812 before we join the workforce. fuck
changing lives.
bottom line, St. Mary's has an amazing faculty and staff,
and blaming rising tuition on their -genuinely- innovative approach, rather
than the financial crisis and the pressure
it's put on state budgets, is bullshit. i have a lot of love for SMCM as an
institution and it's facing
hard times right now, so I guess my point here is don't let this hack
distract you, or at least don't let the feelings this editorial evoked in you
go to waste.
this isn't just about Anne Neal or even SMCM, shit like this
is happening nationwide. chicago just
shut down 50 public schools under this same market fundamentalist
"narrowly defined results at all costs" mentality. there's a social
mission inherent in public education -- we
rely on it to make up for our sins, to provide for equality of opportunity
and the american dream and all that shit, but it can’t do that if we let the Anne
Neals and Arne Duncans of the world turn it into another way to make a quick
buck.