It seems there are two issues that 'people' are having with the SGA.
- President Mark Snyder over break wrote up a new constitution over Winter Break (with limited input from the SGA?) which
- removes the MHEC (Maryland Higher Education Council) Representative position. Without discussing it with the current MHEC Rep...
- changes the requirements for running for President/Vice President of the SGA that they must be on campus in the Spring Semester if they want to run.
RE: Issue 1: Apparently (via unsubstantiated rumors [via I didn't go]) the current MHEC-bro Mike Hullett did not know that there was this proposed change until the meeting and got upset and had the SGA table (AKA make everyone wait ANOTHER week to vote on it) the measure. Not really sure why he wants to get rid of the position, or discussed it with the current dude regarding whether or not we should have it.
RE: Issue 2: Some speculation that this is via he does not support the White/Reighart ticket, and did this out of spite (via they are currently abroad, but this would not affect them). Not all that likely via I don't think he is that silly/childish. Other more reasonable reason behind it is probably that he feels that the new Prez should be trained. Regarding Mark Snyder and training, from an anonymous SGA member: "also, if mark is so concerned about training maybe he should have trained his senate" via the lack of legislation (srsly they need more legislation like this wonderful piece of legislation regarding All Capital Letter Emails).
One anonymous bro said on this issue "I think many talented student leaders who have put in their time at SMCM and took advantage of its great study abroad offerings should not be penalized for going abroad the semester before their term would start. The student body should not have to be managed in this way, we should be trusted enough to give power to any student leader, even those who have decided to study abroad for a semester. We know who can represent us well and those who run for this office take it seriously. Extra regulation like this is completely unnecessary and rather offensive when it seeks to possibly limit the chance of a qualified, well-intentioned student leader to lead the school if the student body so wishes it."
IDK Blog-readers. What do yall think? Are people taking SGA too srlsy???